Skip to main content

AEPD has published guidance on agentic AI

 

Original Post in LinkedIn

I have been saying for a while that AI is no longer just about models… it is about systems that act.

Now regulators are catching up.

The Spanish Data Protection Agency (AEPD) has published guidance on agentic AI from a data protection perspective.

And this is important.

Because agentic AI is fundamentally different. These are not systems that just answer… they decide, interact, and execute autonomously to achieve goals.

That changes everything.

It changes how data is accessed, how decisions are made, and how responsibility is assigned. And one key message stands out: using AI does not remove accountability. Organizations remain fully responsible for data protection, transparency, and control.

From an architecture perspective, this reinforces something we often underestimate.

You cannot build agentic AI on top of weak data foundations.

Governance, data minimization, traceability, and privacy-by-design are no longer compliance topics… they are core system design principles.

We are entering a phase where:

AI architecture = Data architecture + Governance + Responsibility

And the more autonomous the system becomes, the more intentional the design must be.

This is not about slowing innovation.
It’s about making it sustainable.

- Manuel

Link to AEPD news


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The apocalyptic AI narratives era

 The AI industry may be entering a strange phase where narrative engineering advances faster than the underlying engineering itself. That does not mean frontier AI is fake. It is not. The progress is real. Models are improving quickly in coding, search, reasoning assistance, content generation, and cybersecurity analysis. Anyone working seriously in enterprise technology can already see the productivity impact. AI is becoming operationally useful. But something else is happening in parallel. Every few months, another company announces that its newest model is so powerful, so dangerous, or so transformative that humanity must proceed carefully. The language changes slightly each cycle, but the structure remains almost identical: existential concern, dramatic warnings, selective access, media amplification, institutional reaction, investor excitement, and another jump in valuation. At some point, it becomes reasonable to ask whether we are witnessing purely a technological revolution...

Problemas de dependencia entre Chrome y libappindicator1 en Xubuntu 14.04 LTS

Recientemente re-instalé en mi laptop Ubuntu pero la distro de Xubuntu 14.04 LTS, todo bien hasta que intenté instalar Google Chrome, me generaba un error de dependencia con libappindicator1: Los siguientes paquetes tienen dependencias incumplidas:  libappindicator1 : Depende: libindicator7 (>= 0.4.90) pero no va a instalarse La solución a esto es muy sencilla: en un terminal escribir los siguientes comandos: sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get check sudo apt-get -f install El primero actualiza la lista de paquetes a ser actualizados. El segundo verifica que no tengas problemas de dependencia, en nuestro caso si las hay. El tercero repara los problemas de dependencias. Listo, ya te debería de funcionar el Chrome.

Análisis de la película “Tiempos Modernos” desde la perspectiva de Crozier, Friedberg, Taylor y Fayol

Introducción En las siguientes páginas se analizará una película de Charlie Chaplin llamada “Tiempos Modernos” producida por él en EEUU en el año 1936. Para dicho análisis se utilizará como base teórica la introducción, “Les contraintes de l’ action collective”, del libro L´Acteur et le Systeme de Michel de Crozier y Erhard Friedberg, adicionalmente se usará el capítulo 17, “Introducción al Fayolismo I. Hipótesis. Proposiciones técnicas. La discusión con el Taylorismo”, del primer tomo del libro El Pensamiento Organizativo: del Taylorismo a la Teoría de la Organización . El motivo de dicho análisis es intentar relacionar la teoría del pensamiento organizacional según la perspectiva de las lecturas.