Skip to main content

The Invisible Builder and The Visible Translator

    

Original Post In LinkedIn

    Today I had a conversation with my boss, Soumya, someone I genuinely consider a mentor, and it led to a reflection that stayed with me.

I asked him:

Do you know who Dennis Ritchie is… without googling it?
Do you know who Steve Jobs is?

Then I told him:

“I am Dennis Ritchie… and you are Steve Jobs.”

And I meant it.

Because there is a quiet truth in how impact is perceived.

Not everyone remembers the inventor of the wrench.
But everyone remembers the brand that made it known, usable, and desirable.

Some of us operate deep in the foundations; building systems, architectures, and platforms that power everything else. Work that is critical, but often invisible.

Others have the ability to translate that complexity, connect it to real human value, and bring it into the world in a way that people understand, adopt, and remember.

The world doesn’t always reward creation alone.
It rewards connection, storytelling, and adoption.

But here is the part that matters most.

This is not a comparison. It is a partnership.

Without Dennis Ritchie, there is no modern computing.
Without Steve Jobs, many of those innovations would have never reached people the way they did.

In data platforms and AI, this is something I see every day.

Engineering without storytelling stays hidden.
Storytelling without substance fades quickly.

Real impact happens when both meet.

Grateful for conversations like this; and for leaders like Soumya who not only understand technology, but know how to make it matter.

Labels:
Location: Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, España

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The apocalyptic AI narratives era

 The AI industry may be entering a strange phase where narrative engineering advances faster than the underlying engineering itself. That does not mean frontier AI is fake. It is not. The progress is real. Models are improving quickly in coding, search, reasoning assistance, content generation, and cybersecurity analysis. Anyone working seriously in enterprise technology can already see the productivity impact. AI is becoming operationally useful. But something else is happening in parallel. Every few months, another company announces that its newest model is so powerful, so dangerous, or so transformative that humanity must proceed carefully. The language changes slightly each cycle, but the structure remains almost identical: existential concern, dramatic warnings, selective access, media amplification, institutional reaction, investor excitement, and another jump in valuation. At some point, it becomes reasonable to ask whether we are witnessing purely a technological revolution...
2 comments
Read more

Problemas de dependencia entre Chrome y libappindicator1 en Xubuntu 14.04 LTS

Recientemente re-instalé en mi laptop Ubuntu pero la distro de Xubuntu 14.04 LTS, todo bien hasta que intenté instalar Google Chrome, me generaba un error de dependencia con libappindicator1: Los siguientes paquetes tienen dependencias incumplidas:  libappindicator1 : Depende: libindicator7 (>= 0.4.90) pero no va a instalarse La solución a esto es muy sencilla: en un terminal escribir los siguientes comandos: sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get check sudo apt-get -f install El primero actualiza la lista de paquetes a ser actualizados. El segundo verifica que no tengas problemas de dependencia, en nuestro caso si las hay. El tercero repara los problemas de dependencias. Listo, ya te debería de funcionar el Chrome.
7 comments
Read more

Análisis de la película “Tiempos Modernos” desde la perspectiva de Crozier, Friedberg, Taylor y Fayol

Introducción En las siguientes páginas se analizará una película de Charlie Chaplin llamada “Tiempos Modernos” producida por él en EEUU en el año 1936. Para dicho análisis se utilizará como base teórica la introducción, “Les contraintes de l’ action collective”, del libro L´Acteur et le Systeme de Michel de Crozier y Erhard Friedberg, adicionalmente se usará el capítulo 17, “Introducción al Fayolismo I. Hipótesis. Proposiciones técnicas. La discusión con el Taylorismo”, del primer tomo del libro El Pensamiento Organizativo: del Taylorismo a la Teoría de la Organización . El motivo de dicho análisis es intentar relacionar la teoría del pensamiento organizacional según la perspectiva de las lecturas.  
6 comments
Read more